| A few years ago I couldn’t image that I’d spend 4 years working on the past, I wanted to work on the future. In fact my last big project prior to the AIDS survey was called City of the Future (after Tarkovski). It was a queer retelling of a famous Russian science fiction film called Solaris that was remade in 2002 starring George Clooney.
This is the opening sequence to City of the Future.
The piece is about a mysterious planet that senses the secrets and desires of its visitors -- and then generates these ideas as beings. Some of these thoughts and feelings are monsters and others are beautiful and loving.
I hope that I’m not over simplify it here by saying that the anti-hero of the story is condemned to relive the tragedy of his deepest shame and guilt.
The planet brings back the wife of the main character, who feels responsible for her death, only to have her die again in this future world because of him.
The story is about desire and loss at the heart of futuritythat our past (as something always desired and already lost to us) is embedded in our future.
This was the central theme--of desire and loss--that I was revisiting, and trying to work out in my art practice when I was making City of The Future.
I was asking myself: Am I just retelling my own coded story of loss over and over in my work?
Are we (am I) as part of a queer/women’s/people of color/underclass community just retelling our story, restating our lack, our otherness, over and over in our representations?
I posed this as a question in City of the Future and wondered if there was another way out of this repetition?
And so it is that I have spent the last 4 years talking about the past and trying to locate a vision of an alternative future.
|